Is exercising late in the morning associated with a reduced risk of cardiovascular disease?

Is exercising late in the morning associated with a reduced risk of cardiovascular disease?

OVERVIEW

  • Participants in a study who exercised in the late morning had a 16% lower risk of a coronary event and a 17% lower risk of a stroke compared to those who exercised at another time of day.
  • These effects were particularly pronounced in women, but are non-significant when considering data for men only.
  • These results illustrate the potential importance of chronoactivity in the prevention of cardiovascular disease.

Is it better to exercise in the morning or later in the day to reduce the risk of cardiovascular disease? This is a question that Dutch researchers have tried to answer in a study of 86,657 participants in the UK-Biobank cohort, aged 62 on average. Participants’ physical activity data was collected at the start of the study using a wrist-worn triaxial accelerometer over a 7-day period. Six years after the start of the study, 3,707 cardiovascular events had been reported. Participants who exercised late in the morning had a 16% lower risk of a coronary event and a 17% lower risk of a stroke, compared to those who exercised at another time of day.

These effects were particularly pronounced in women. In contrast, most of the favourable associations of morning physical activity disappeared when the researchers analyzed data from men only. This difference remains unexplained and raises the possibility that a confounding factor may be the cause. Do women who exercise in the morning have better lifestyle habits, unrelated to physical exercise, such as better diet?

Previous studies had shown a favourable association between morning physical activity and better cardiometabolic health, both for obesity (see herehere and here), type 2 diabetes, and hypertension. However, a number of studies have shown completely opposite results. For example, a recent study in Brazil indicates that for hypertensive men, evening exercise was more effective than morning exercise in restoring the heart rate and lowering blood pressure. Additionally, a Swedish study of men with type 2 diabetes indicates that high-intensity interval training (HIIT) performed in the afternoon was more effective than morning exercise in improving blood sugar levels. It should be noted that these last two intervention studies are of the “randomized and controlled” type, a study design that provides a relatively high level of scientific evidence, even if these studies were carried out with a small number of participants.

Further studies will be needed to better understand the chronoactivity phenomena, but regardless of whether it is done in the morning, afternoon or evening, it is well established that physical exercise is beneficial for cardiovascular health, mental health and overall health.

Association between red meat consumption and the risk of cardiovascular disease: An important role of L-carnitine metabolites

Association between red meat consumption and the risk of cardiovascular disease: An important role of L-carnitine metabolites

OVERVIEW

  • In a prospective American study (cohort of 3931 people), a higher consumption of red meat was associated with a higher incidence of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease.
  • This unfavourable association is partly attributable to metabolites of L-carnitine, according to a statistical analysis.
  • Blood sugar, blood insulin and C-reactive protein levels are also linked to the risk of cardiovascular disease associated with meat consumption, unlike cholesterol levels and blood pressure which are not linked according to this study.

 

Trimethylamine oxide (TMAO) is a metabolite produced by the intestinal microbiome from carnitine and choline, two compounds present in large quantities in red meat such as beef and pork. High blood levels of TMAO have been associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular disease.


Figure 1. Pathways of synthesis of trimethylamine oxide (TMAO) and its intermediates. The arrows in black represent the transformations carried out by the host and the arrows in red, those carried out by the intestinal microbiota. In healthy people, γ-butyrobetaine is also synthesized from the amino acid lysine, independently of the gut microbiota. The synthesis of TMAO and crotonobetaine is strongly reduced by the administration of antibiotics, thus demonstrating that the intestinal microbiota plays an essential role in their synthesis. Taken from Wang et al., 2022.

A new prospective study confirms the unfavourable association between red meat consumption and the incidence of cardiovascular disease and indicates that this association is partly attributable to TMAO and other related metabolites. Among 3931 people in a US cohort aged 65 years and older, consumption of foods of animal origin was estimated from detailed questionnaires, and blood levels of TMAO-related metabolites were measured during the course of the study with an average duration of 12.5 years. In addition, blood levels of other markers possibly associated with cardiovascular disease, such as glucose, cholesterol, triglycerides and C-reactive protein (a marker of inflammation), were also measured. The incidence of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease or ASCVD (myocardial infarction, fatal coronary heart disease, stroke, other deaths caused by atherosclerosis) was determined at the end of the study.

Consumption of unprocessed red meat, total meat (unprocessed and processed), or foods of animal origin was associated with higher risks of ASCVD by 15%, 22%, and 18%, respectively, when comparing participants who consumed more meat products (last quintile) with those who consumed the least (first quintile). Consumption of fish, poultry and eggs was not associated with a significantly increased risk of cardiovascular disease. Processed meat considered in isolation was associated with an 11% increase in cardiovascular risk, but this increase was not statistically significant.

The researchers carried out a mediation analysis, a statistical technique used to determine whether a particular factor, in this case TMAO metabolites, influenced the incidence of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. According to the results of the analysis, the three metabolites generated by the intestinal microbiota from L-carnitine (TMAO, γ-butyrobetaine and crotonobetaine) were partly responsible for the unfavourable association with the consumption of unprocessed red meat, total meat, and foods of animal origin, with proportions mediating 10.6%, 7.8%, and 9.2% of the risk, respectively. The researchers estimated that for every 1.14 daily servings of meat (of any kind), the relative risk of ASCVD increases by 22%, translating into 6.32 additional events per 1000 person-years.

Mediation analysis applied to other potential risk factors indicates that blood glucose, blood insulin, and C-reactive protein levels are also related to the risk of ASCVD associated with the consumption of meat (of any kind), but that is not the case for cholesterol and blood pressure. The mediation proportions were 26.1% for blood glucose, 11.8% for insulin level, 6.6% for C-reactive protein, 0.6% for cholesterol (not significant), and 0.8% for systolic blood pressure (not significant).

It is important to note that these are associations between the consumption of red meat and the presence of TMAO metabolites and the risk of cardiovascular disease, and not a cause-and-effect relationship. Mediation analysis shows that it is probably L-carnitine and not saturated fat (which raises blood cholesterol) that is linked to the increased risk of cardiovascular disease caused by red meat consumption. These results are consistent with others published recently, which suggest that it is L-carnitine and myoglobin heme that are largely responsible for the harmful effects (incidence of cardiovascular diseases and cancers) of red meat on health, not saturated fat.

The cardiovascular benefits of avocado

The cardiovascular benefits of avocado

OVERVIEW

  • Avocado is an exceptional source of monounsaturated fat, with content similar to that of olive oil.
  • These monounsaturated fats improve the lipid profile, in particular by raising HDL-cholesterol levels, a phenomenon associated with a reduced risk of cardiovascular disease.
  • A recent study confirms this cardioprotective potential of avocado, with a 20% reduction in the risk of coronary heart disease observed in regular consumers (2 or more servings per week).

There is currently a consensus in the scientific community on the importance of favouring dietary sources of unsaturated fats (especially monounsaturated and omega-3 polyunsaturated fats) to significantly reduce the risk of cardiovascular disease and premature mortality (see our article on this subject). With the exception of fatty fish rich in omega-3 (salmon, sardines, mackerel), plant-based foods are the main sources of these unsaturated fats, particularly oils (olive oil and those rich in omega-3 like canola oil), nuts, certain seeds (flax, chia, hemp) as well as fruits such as avocado. Regular consumption of these foods high in unsaturated fats has repeatedly been associated with a marked decrease in the risk of cardiovascular events, a cardioprotective effect that is particularly well documented for extra-virgin olive oil and nuts.

A unique nutritional profile
Although the impact of avocado consumption has been less studied than that of other plant sources of unsaturated fat, it has been suspected for several years that this fruit also exerts positive effects on cardiovascular health. On the one hand, avocado stands out from other fruits for its exceptionally high monounsaturated fat content, with a content (per serving) similar to that of olive oil (Table 1). On the other hand, a serving of avocado contains very high amounts of fibre (4 g), potassium (350 mg), folate (60 µg), and several other vitamins and minerals known to participate in the prevention of cardiovascular disease.

Table 1. Comparison of the lipid profile of avocado and olive oil. The data corresponds to the amount of fatty acids contained in half of a Haas avocado, the main variety consumed in the world, or olive oil (1 tablespoon or 15 mL). Taken from USDA. FoodData Central.

Fatty acidsAvocado (68 g)Olive oil (15 mL)
Total10 g12.7 g
Monounsaturated6.7 g9.4 g
Polyunsaturated1.2 g1.2 g
Saturated1.4 g2.1 g

This positive impact on the heart is also suggested by the results of intervention studies that examined the impact of avocado on certain markers of good cardiovascular health. For example, a meta-analysis of 7 studies (202 participants) indicates that the consumption of avocado is associated with an increase in HDL cholesterol and a decrease in the ratio of total cholesterol to HDL cholesterol, a parameter which is considered to be a good predictor of coronary heart disease mortality. A decrease in triglycerides, total cholesterol and LDL cholesterol levels associated with the consumption of avocado has also been reported, but is, however, not observed in all studies. Nevertheless, the increase in HDL cholesterol observed in all the studies is very encouraging and strongly suggests that avocado could contribute to the prevention of cardiovascular disease.

A cardioprotective fruit
This cardioprotective potential of avocado has just been confirmed by the results of a large-scale epidemiological studycarried out among people enrolled in two large cohorts headed by Harvard University, namely the Nurses’ Health Study (68,786 women) and the Health Professionals Follow-up Study (41,701 men). Over a period of 30 years, researchers periodically collected information on the dietary habits of participants in both studies and subsequently examined the association between avocado consumption and the risk of cardiovascular disease.

The results obtained are very interesting: compared to people who never or very rarely eat them, regular avocado consumers have a risk of coronary heart disease reduced by 16% (1 serving per week) and 21% (2 servings or more per week) (Figure 1).

Figure 1. Association between the frequency of avocado consumption and the risk of coronary heart disease. The quantities indicated refer to one serving of avocado, corresponding to approximately half of the fruit. Taken from Pacheco et al. (2022).

There are therefore only benefits to integrating avocado into our eating habits, especially if its monounsaturated fats replace other sources of fats that are less beneficial to health. According to the researchers’ calculations, replacing half a serving of foods rich in saturated fat (butter, cheese, deli meats) with an equivalent quantity of avocado would reduce the risk of cardiovascular disease by approximately 20%.

Avocados are increasingly popular, especially among young people, and are even predicted to become the 2nd most traded tropical fruit by 2030 globally, just behind bananas. In light of the positive effects of these fruits on cardiovascular health, we can only welcome this new trend.

Obviously, the high demand for avocado creates strong pressures on the fruit’s production systems, particularly in terms of deforestation for the establishment of new crops and increased demand for water. However, it is important to note that the water footprint (the amount of water required for production) of avocado is much lower than that of all animal products, especially beef (Table 2). In addition, as is the case for all plants, the carbon footprint of avocado is also much lower than that of animal products, the production of an avocado generating approximately 0.2 kg of CO2-eq compared to 4 kg for beef.

Table 2. Comparison of the water footprint of avocado and different foods of animal origin. Taken from UNESCO-IHE Institute for Water Education (2010) 

FoodWater footprint
(m3/ton)
Beef15,400
Lamb and sheep10,400
Porc6,000
Chicken4,300
Eggs3,300
Avocado1,981

The influence of oral health on the risk of cardiovascular disease

The influence of oral health on the risk of cardiovascular disease

OVERVIEW

  • Periodontitis is an inflammatory reaction affecting the periodontium, i.e., all the structures responsible for anchoring the teeth (gums, ligaments, alveolar bone).
  • A very large number of studies have observed a close link between periodontitis and an increased risk of several pathologies, including myocardial infarction and stroke.
  • The expansion of health insurance to cover dental care would therefore be an important step forward for cardiovascular prevention and the prevention of several other chronic diseases.

It is now clearly established that the microbiome, the vast bacterial community that lives in symbiosis with us, plays an essential role in the functioning of the human body and the maintenance of good health. This link is particularly well documented with regard to the intestinal microbiome, that is, the hundreds of billions of bacteria that are located in the digestive system, in particular at the level of the colon. In recent years, an impressive number of studies have shown that these bacteria play a leading role in the proper functioning of the metabolism and the immune system and that imbalances in the composition of the microbiome are associated with the development of several chronic diseases.

Oral microbiome
The mouth represents another privileged site of colonization by bacteria; each mL of saliva from a healthy adult contains approximately 100 million bacterial cells, not to mention the millions of bacteria present in other areas of the oral cavity, such as dental plaque, tongue, cheeks, palate, throat and tonsils. It is therefore not surprising that a simple 10-second kiss with tongue contact and exchange of saliva (French kiss) can transfer around 80 million bacteria between partners!

On average, the human mouth contains about 250 distinct bacterial species, from the approximately 700 species of oral bacteria that have been identified so far. The composition of this bacterial community is unique to each person and is influenced by their genetics, age, place of residence, cohabitation with other people, the nature of the diet and, obviously, the frequency of oral hygiene care.

In a healthy mouth, the oral bacterial community is a balanced ecosystem that performs several beneficial functions for the host. For example, some bacteria have anti-inflammatory activity that can block the action of certain pathogens, while others reduce the acidity of dental plaque (through the production of basic compounds such as ammonia) and thus prevent the demineralization of teeth, the first step in the process of tooth decay. Oral bacteria also have the ability to convert nitrates found in fruits and vegetables into nitric oxide (NO), a vasodilator that helps control blood pressure (see our article on this subject).

Disturbed ecosystem
It is the disruption of this balance of the bacterial ecosystem (dysbiosis) that is the trigger for the two main diseases affecting the teeth, namely dental caries and periodontal disease. In the case of caries, the cause is the establishment of a bacterial community enriched in certain species (Streptococci of the mutans group, in particular), capable of fermenting dietary sugars and reducing the pH sufficiently to initiate the demineralization of the tooth. The action of these bacteria is however local, restricted to the level of tooth enamel, and therefore generally does not have a major impact on health in general.

The global repercussions associated with periodontal diseases are much more serious, and it is for this reason that these infections have attracted a great deal of interest from the scientific and medical communities in recent years. Not only with regard to the identification of the bacteria responsible for these infections and their mechanisms of action, but also, and perhaps above all, because of the close relationship observed in several epidemiological studies between periodontitis and several serious chronic diseases, including cardiovascular disease, diabetes, certain cancers and even Alzheimer’s disease.

Periodontitis
As its name suggests, periodontitis is an inflammatory reaction affecting the periodontium, i.e., all the structures responsible for anchoring the teeth (gums, ligaments, alveolar bone) (Figure 1). Periodontitis begins in the form of gingivitis, which is local inflammation of the gums caused by bacteria present in dental plaque (the bacterial biofilm that forms on the teeth). This inflammation is usually quite benign and reversible, but can progress to chronic periodontitis in some more susceptible individuals. There is then a gradual resorption of the gums, ligaments and alveolar bone, which causes the appearance of periodontal pockets around the tooth and, eventually, its fall. Periodontal disease is one of the most common chronic inflammatory diseases, affecting almost 50% of the population to varying degrees, including 10% who develop severe forms of the disease, and is one of the main causes of tooth loss.

Figure 1. Schematic illustration of the main features of periodontitis. Image from Shutterstock.

The trigger factor for periodontitis is an imbalance in the composition of the microbial community present in dental plaque that promotes the growth of pathogenic species responsible for this infection. Among the approximately 400 different species of bacteria associated with dental plaque, the presence of a complex composed of the anaerobic bacteria Porphyromonas gingivalis, Treponema denticola, and Tanneralla forsythia (known as the red complex) is closely correlated with clinical measures of periodontitis, and more particularly with advanced periodontal lesions, and could therefore play an important role in the development of these pathologies. It is also interesting to note that the analysis of human skeletons has revealed that periodontitis became more frequent around 10,000 years ago (in the Neolithic period) and that this increase coincides with the increased presence of one of these bacteria (P. gingivalis) in dental plaque. It is likely that this change in plaque microbial composition is a consequence of changes in the human diet introduced by agriculture, in particular a higher carbohydrate intake.

A disproportionate inflammatory response
It is the exaggerated inflammatory response caused by the presence of this bacterial imbalance in dental plaque that is largely responsible for the development of periodontitis (Figure 2).


Figure 2. Impact of inflammation generated by bacterial imbalance (dysbiosis) on the development of periodontitis.
In a healthy mouth (left figure), the bacterial biofilm is in balance with the host’s immune system and does not generate an inflammatory response. Disruption of this balance (by poor dental hygiene or smoking, for example) can cause gingivitis, which is a mild inflammation of the gums characterized by the formation of a slight gingival crevice (≤ 3 mm deep), but without bone damage. Gingivitis can progress to periodontitis when the bacterial imbalance of the biofilm induces a strong inflammatory reaction that destroys the tissues surrounding the tooth to form deeper periodontal pockets (≥ 4 mm) and the destruction of the alveolar bone. From Hajishengallis (2015).

When they manage to colonize the subgingival space, pathogenic bacteria such as P. gingivalis secrete numerous virulence factors (proteases, hemolytic factors, etc.) that degrade the tissues present at the site of infection and generate the essential elements for the growth of these bacteria. The bleeding gums caused by this infection is particularly beneficial for P. gingivalis since the growth of this bacterium requires a high supply of iron, present in the heme group of the hemoglobin of red blood cells.

The immune system obviously reacts strongly to this microbial invasion (which can reach several hundred million bacteria in certain deep periodontal pockets) by recruiting at the site of infection the first-line innate immunity (neutrophils, macrophages), specialized in the rapid response to the presence of pathogens. There is then massive production of cytokines, prostaglandins, and matrix metalloproteinases by these immune cells which, collectively, create a high-intensity inflammation intended to eliminate the bacteria present in the periodontal tissues.

However, this inflammatory response does not have the expected effects at all. On the one hand, periodontal bacteria have developed several subterfuges to escape the immune response and are therefore little affected by the host response; on the other hand, the continuous presence of an inflammatory microenvironment causes considerable damage to the periodontal tissues, which accelerates their destruction and the resorption of the gums, ligaments and bone characteristic of periodontitis. This inflammatory attack on the periodontium also has the perverse effect of generating several essential nutrients for bacterial growth, which further amplifies the infection and accelerates the degradation of the tissues surrounding the tooth. In other words, periodontitis is the result of a vicious circle in which the bacterial imbalance associated with dental plaque provokes a strong inflammatory immune response, with this inflammation leading to the destruction of the periodontal tissues, which in turn promotes the growth of these bacteria (Figure 3).

Figure 3. Amplification of the inflammatory response is responsible for the development of periodontitis. The imbalance of the microbiome of dental plaque (dysbiosis) leads to the activation of the immune defences (mainly the complement system and the Toll-like receptors (TLR)) and the triggering of an inflammatory response. This inflammation causes the destruction of the tissues surrounding the tooth, including the alveolar bone, which generates several nutrients that support the proliferation of pathogenic bacteria, adapted to grow in these inflammatory conditions. An amplification loop is therefore created in which inflammation promotes bacterial growth and vice versa, which supports the progression of periodontitis.

The mechanisms involved in this “immunodestruction” are extraordinarily complex and will not be described in detail here, but let us only mention that the sustained presence of periodontal bacteria activates certain defence systems specialized in the rapid response to infections (Toll-like receptors and complement system) present on the surface of immune cells, which activates the production of inflammatory molecules that are very irritating to the surrounding tissues. In the alveolar bone, for example, the production of cytokines (interleukin-17, in particular) stimulates the cells involved in the breakdown of bone tissue (osteoclasts) and leads to bone resorption.

It is important to mention that even if the initiation of periodontitis depends on the presence of pathogenic bacteria in dental plaque, the evolution of the disease remains strongly influenced by several factors, both genetic and associated with lifestyle. For example, there is a strong genetic predisposition to periodontal disease, with an estimated heritability of 50%: some people do not develop periodontitis despite a massive build-up of tartar (and bacteria) around the teeth, while others will be affected by the disease despite a small amount of dental plaque. These differences in susceptibility to periodontitis are thought to be caused by the presence of variations (polymorphisms) in certain genes involved in the inflammatory response.

In terms of lifestyle habits, the nature of the diet, certain metabolic diseases such as obesity and type 2 diabetes, stress and smoking are well-documented aggravating factors for periodontitis. This influence is particularly dramatic for smoking, which has catastrophic effects on the onset, progression and severity of periodontitis, with an increase in the risk of the disease that can reach more than 25 times (see Table 3). It should be noted that a common point to all of these risk factors is that they all influence in one way or another the degree of inflammation, which highlights to what extent the development of periodontitis depends on the intensity of the host’s inflammatory response in reaction to the presence of pathogenic bacteria in dental plaque.

Periodontitis and cardiovascular disease
Although the damage caused by this disproportionate inflammatory response is first and foremost local, at the level of the tissues surrounding the tooth, the fact remains that the inflammatory molecules that are generated at the site of infection are in close contact with the bloodstream and can therefore diffuse into the blood and affect the whole body. The impact of this systemic inflammation is probably very important, as numerous studies have reported that the incidence of periodontitis is strongly correlated with the presence of several other diseases (comorbidities) whose development is influenced by chronic inflammation, in particular cardiovascular disease, diabetes, certain cancers and arthritis (Table 1).

Table 1. Association of periodontitis with different pathologies.

Comorbidities of periodontitisObserved phenomenaSources
Cardiovascular diseasePeriodontitis is associated with an increased risk of heart attack and stroke.See Table 2 references.
Diabetes (types 1 and 2)Chronic inflammation associated with diabetes accelerates the destruction of periodontal tissues.Lalla and Papapanou (2011)
This association between the two diseases is bidirectional, as the chronic inflammation generated by periodontitis increases insulin resistance and in turn disrupts blood sugar control.
Alzheimer'sSeveral epidemiological studies have reported an association between periodontitis and the risk of developing Alzheimer’s disease.Dioguardi et al. (2020)
The periodontal bacterium P. gingivalis (DNA, proteases) has been detected in the brains of patients who have died of Alzheimer’s disease as well as in the cerebrospinal fluid of people suffering from the disease. Dominy et al. (2019)
The risk of mortality from Alzheimer’s disease is correlated with antibody levels to a group of periodontal bacteria, including P. gingivalis, Campylobacter rectus, and Prevotella melaninogenica.Beydoun et al. (2020)
Rheumatoid arthritisSeveral epidemiological studies have observed an association between periodontitis and rheumatoid arthritis.Sher et al. (2014)
The inflammation caused by periodontitis stimulates the production of cells that increase bone resorption in the joints.Zhao et al. (2020)
CancerThe incidence of colorectal cancer is 50% higher in individuals with a history of periodontitis.Janati et al. (2022)
A periodontal bacterium (Fusobacterium nucleatum) has been repeatedly observed in colorectal cancers. Castellarin et al. (2011)
High levels of P. gingivalis have been detected in oral cancers.Katz et al. (2011)
High levels of antibodies against P. gingivalis are associated with a 2-fold higher risk of pancreatic cancer. Michaud et al. (2013)
Liver diseasesPeriodontitis is correlated with an increased incidence of liver disease.Helenius-Hietala et al. (2019)
In patients with fatty liver disease or non-alcoholic steatohepatitis, treatment of periodontitis decreases blood levels of markers of liver damage.Yoneda et al. (2012)
Intestinal diseasesChronic inflammatory bowel disease is associated with an increased risk of periodontitis.Papageorgiou et al. (2017)
This relationship is bidirectional, as periodontal bacteria ingested via saliva contribute to intestinal inflammation and disrupt the microbiome and intestinal barrier.Kitamoto et al. (2020)
Pregnancy complicationsMaternal periodontitis is associated with a higher risk of undesirable pregnancy outcomes such as miscarriages, premature deliveries, and low birth weight.Madianos et al. (2013)
Periodontal bacteria (P. gingivalis, F. nucleatum) have been observed in the placenta and clinical studies have reported a link between the presence of these bacteria and pregnancy complications.Han and Wang (2013)

The link between periodontitis and cardiovascular disease has been particularly studied because it is clearly established that inflammation participates in all stages of the development of atherosclerosis, from the appearance of the first lesions caused by the infiltration of white blood cells which store cholesterol, until the formation of clots that block blood circulation and cause heart attack and stroke. These inflammatory conditions are usually a consequence of certain lifestyle factors (smoking, poor diet, stress, physical inactivity), but can also be created by acute infections (influenza and COVID-19, for example) or chronic infections (Chlamydia pneumoniae, Helicobacter pylori, human immunodeficiency virus). Since all of these infections increase the risk of cardiovascular disease, it is therefore possible that a similar phenomenon exists for the chronic inflammation that results from periodontitis.

The first clue to the existence of a link between periodontitis and the risk of cardiovascular disease comes from a study published in 1989, where it was observed that a group of patients who had suffered a myocardial infarction had poorer oral health (more cavities, gingivitis, periodontitis) than a control group. Since then, hundreds of studies examining the issue have confirmed this association and shown that the presence of oral health problems, periodontitis in particular, is very often correlated with an increased risk of heart attack and stroke (Table 2).

 

Table 2. Summary of the main studies reporting an association between periodontitis and the risk of heart attack and stroke.

Measured parameterObserved phenomenonSources
Coronary artery diseasePeriodontitis is associated with an increased risk of heart attack (men < 50 years).DeStefano et al. (1993)

Poor oral health (caries, periodontitis) is associated with an increased risk of heart attack and sudden death in coronary patients.Mattila et al. (1995)
Tooth loss caused by periodontitis is associated with an increased risk of heart attack and sudden death.Joshipura et al. (1996)
Bone loss caused by periodontitis is associated with an increased risk of heart attack, fatal and non-fatal.Beck et al. (1996)
The severity of periodontitis (bone loss) is associated with an increased risk of heart attack.Arbes et al. (1999)
Periodontitis is associated with an increased risk of fatal infarction.Morrison et al. (1999)
Periodontitis is associated with a slight (non-significant) increase in the risk of coronary heart attacks.Hujoel et al. (2000)
Periodontitis is associated with a slight (non-significant) increase in the risk of heart attack.Howell et al. (2001)
Bleeding gums are correlated with a higher risk of heart attack.Buhlin et al. (2002)
Periodontitis is associated with a higher risk of hospitalization for heart attack, angina or unstable angina.López et al. (2002)
High levels of antibodies against two pathogens responsible for periodontitis (A. actinomycetemcomitans and P. gingivalis) are associated with an increased risk of coronary heart disease.Pussinen et al. (2003)
Coronary patients more often experience poor oral health and an increase in inflammatory markers.Meurman et al. (2003)
Periodontitis is associated with an increased risk of mortality from coronary heart disease.Ajwani et al. (2003)
High levels of antibodies against a bacterium responsible for periodontitis (P. gingivalis) are associated with an increased risk of heart attack.Pussinen et al. (2004)
Periodontitis is associated with an increase (15%) in the risk of coronary heart disease (meta-analysis).Khader et al. (2004)
Periodontitis, combined with tooth loss, is associated with an increased risk of coronary heart disease.Elter et al. (2004)
Oral pathologies are more common in coronary patients.Janket et al. (2004)
Periodontitis is more common in coronary patients.Geerts et al. (2004)
High levels of antibodies against the bacteria responsible for periodontitis are associated with an increased risk of coronary heart disease in both smokers and non-smokers.Beck et al. (2005)
Higher levels of antibodies to bacteria involved in periodontitis (P. gingivalis and A. actinomycetemcomitans) are associated with an increased risk of coronary heart disease.Pussinen et al. (2005)
The presence of deep periodontal pockets is more common in women with coronary artery disease.Buhlin et al. (2005)
Periodontitis is associated with a higher risk of acute infarction.Cueto et al. (2005)
Periodontitis and levels of pathogenic bacteria (A. actinomycetemcomitans in particular) in the subgingival biofilm are associated with an increased risk of coronary heart disease.Spahr et al. (2006)
Periodontitis is more common in patients with coronary artery disease.Geismar et al. (2006)
Poor periodontal health is associated with an increased risk of coronary heart disease.Briggs et al. (2006)
Gingivitis, cavities and tooth loss are all associated with an increased risk of angina.Ylostalo et al. (2006)
Patients with acute coronary syndrome are at greater risk of being affected by periodontitis simultaneously.Accarini and de Godoy (2006)
The severity of periodontitis (bone loss) is associated with an increased risk of heart attack in 40-60 year-olds.Holmlund et al. (2006)
Patients affected by periodontitis have an increased risk (15%) of coronary heart disease (meta-analysis).Bahekar et al. (2007)
Periodontitis is associated with an increased risk of acute coronary syndrome.Rech et al. (2007)
Patients with acute coronary syndrome are more likely to have oral microbial flora enriched with periodontitis-causing bacteria.Rubenfire et al. (2007)
Periodontitis is associated with an increased risk of heart attack in both men and women.Andriankaja et al. (2007)
Coronary patients have deeper periodontal pockets and higher levels of a bacterium (Prevotella intermidia) involved in periodontitis.Nonnenmacher et al. (2007)
Men and women with < 10 teeth have a higher risk of coronary heart disease than those with > 25 teeth.Hung et al. (2007)
The severity of coronary artery disease (number of vessels affected) is correlated with the severity of periodontal disease.Gotsman et al. (2007)
Severe periodontitis is more common in patients with coronary artery disease.Starkhammar Johansson et al. (2008)
Chronic periodontitis is associated with an increased risk of coronary heart disease in men < 60 years of age.Dietrich et al. (2008)
Periodontitis is associated with an increased risk of angina and heart attack in both men and women.Senba et al. (2008)
Higher levels of antibodies to bacteria involved in periodontitis (P. gingivalis, A. actinomycetemcomitans, T. forsythia, and T. denticola) are associated with an increased risk of heart attack.Lund Håheim et al. (2008)
Higher levels of antibodies to bacteria involved in periodontitis (P. gingivalis and A. actinomycetemcomitans) are associated with increased coronary artery calcification in type 1 diabetics.Colhoun et al. (2008)
The severity of periodontitis is correlated with greater blockage of the coronary arteries.Amabile et al. (2008)
The risk of coronary injury is higher (34%) in patients with periodontitis (meta-analysis).Blaizot et al. (2009)
Periodontitis is associated with a 24-35% increase in the risk of coronary heart disease (meta-analysis).Sanz et al. (2010)
Mortality from coronary heart disease is 7 times higher in patients with < 10 teeth compared to those with > 25 teeth.Holmlund et al. (2010)
High levels of two bacteria involved in periodontitis (Tannerella forsythensis and Prevotella intermedia) are correlated with an increased risk of heart attack.Andriankaja et al. (2011)
Periodontitis is associated with a higher risk of heart attack, regardless of smoking and diabetes.Rydén et al. (2016)
Periodontitis is associated with a twice as high risk of a heart attack (meta-analysis).Shi et al. (2016)
Patients with periodontitis are at higher risk of heart attack, cardiovascular mortality and all-cause mortality.Hansen et al. (2016)
Periodontitis doubles the risk of a heart attack (meta-analysis).Xu et al. (2017)
Oral infections in childhood (including cavities and periodontitis) are associated with the thickening of the carotid wall in adulthood.Pussinen et al. (2019)
Periodontitis and tooth loss are associated with a higher risk of coronary heart disease (meta-analysis).Gao et al. (2021)
Inflammation caused by periodontitis is associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular events.Van Dyke et al. (2021)
People affected by periodontitis have an increased risk of coronary heart attacks and premature mortality.Bengtsson et al. (2021)
StrokeBone loss caused by periodontitis is associated with an increased risk of stroke.Beck et al. (1996)
Poor oral health is associated with an increased risk of stroke in men > 60 years of age.Loesche et al. (1998)
Severe gingivitis, periodontitis and tooth loss are associated with an increased risk of fatal stroke.Morrison et al. (1999)
Periodontitis is associated with an increased risk of stroke (non-hemorrhagic).Wu et al. (2000)
Periodontitis is associated with a slight (non-significant) increase in the risk of stroke.Howell et al. (2001)
Bleeding gums are associated with a higher risk of stroke.Buhlin et al. (2002)
Periodontitis and tooth loss (< 24 teeth) are associated with an increased risk of stroke.Joshipura et al. (2003)
The risk of stroke associated with periodontitis is 2 times higher than the risk of coronary heart disease (2.85 vs 1.44)Janket et al. (2003)
Severe periodontitis (bone loss) is associated with an increased risk of stroke.Elter et al. (2003)
Severe periodontitis is associated with an increased risk of stroke.Dorfer et al. (2004)
High levels of antibodies against two pathogens responsible for periodontitis (A. actinomycetemcomitans and P. gingivalis) are associated with an increased risk of stroke (primary and secondary).Pussinen et al. (2004)
Periodontitis is associated with an increased risk of stroke in men < 60 years of age.Grau et al. (2004)
Higher-than-normal tooth loss is associated with a higher risk of stroke-related mortality and all-cause mortality.Abnet et al. (2005)
Poor periodontal health is associated with an increased risk of stroke.Lee et al. (2006)
Higher levels of antibodies to a bacterium involved in periodontitis (P. gingivalis) are associated with an increased risk of stroke.Pussinen et al. (2007)
Loss of > 9 teeth is associated with an increased risk of stroke.Tu et al. (2007)
Periodontitis is associated with an increased risk of stroke in 60-year-old and normotensive men.Sim et al. (2008)
The loss of > 7 teeth is associated with an increased risk of stroke (ischemic and hemorrhagic).Choe et al. (2009)
Bone loss caused by periodontitis is associated with a higher risk of stroke, especially in men < 65 years of age.Jimenez et al. (2009)
The loss of > 17 teeth is associated with an increase in inflammatory markers and an increased risk of stroke.You et al. (2009)
Periodontitis is associated with an increased risk of fatal stroke.Holmlund et al. (2010)
Periodontitis (periodontal pocket > 4.5 mm) is associated with an increased risk of stroke.Pradeep et al. (2010)
Periodontitis is associated with an increased risk of hemorrhagic stroke in obese men.Kim et al. (2010)
Patients with periodontitis are at greater risk of stroke, cardiovascular mortality and all-cause mortality.Hansen et al. (2016)
Periodontitis is associated with an increased risk of carotid atherosclerosis (meta-analysis)Zeng et al. (2016)
The severity of periodontitis is associated with an increased risk of stroke. Conversely, regular dental care is associated with a decreased risk.Sen et al. (2018)
Periodontitis is associated with an increased risk of stroke affecting the major arteries.Mascari et al. (2021)

 

Bacterial invasion
In addition to the chronic inflammation generated by gum infection, it has also been proposed that damage to periodontal tissues may provide bacteria with an entry point into the circulation, a phenomenon similar to that frequently observed for many pathogen agents (about 50 bacterial species and many viruses). One of the best examples is arguably endocarditis, an infection that occurs when bacteria from dental plaque enter the bloodstream through the gums and attach themselves to the inner walls of the heart chambers and valves. It is for this reason that patients who need to undergo surgery to treat valvular heart conditions (the replacement or repair of heart valves) and who have dental problems are referred to their dentist to treat these conditions before the operation to prevent postoperative valve infection. In addition, patients with prosthetic heart valves or valvular pathologies are prescribed antibiotics before dental procedures to prevent endocarditis (bacterial infection of a heart valve).

Bacteremia (presence of bacteria in the blood) associated with periodontitis also allows pathogens to come into contact with the wall of blood vessels and penetrate the endothelial and muscle cells of these vessels, including at the level of atherosclerotic plaques. In this sense, it should be noted that infection with the main periodontal bacterium (P. gingivalis) is associated with an acceleration of the development of atherosclerosis in animal models, possibly in response to the innate inflammatory immune response directed against the bacterium at the vessel level. In sum, the link between periodontitis and cardiovascular disease is biologically plausible, whether due to the diffusion of inflammatory molecules that diffuse into the circulation or the presence of bacteria in the vessels.

Common risk factors
As a statement from the American Heart Association on the matter points out, however, it is difficult to demonstrate that these associations are causal, i.e., that periodontitis is directly responsible for the increased risk of CVD observed in these studies. This difficulty is largely due to the fact that the risk factors for periodontitis are very similar to those responsible for CV diseases (which are called in epidemiology confounding factors, i.e., variables that may influence both the risk factor and the disease being studied) (Table 3). The best example is undoubtedly smoking, which is both the most important risk factor for cardiovascular disease and periodontitis, but this similarity is also observed for all the “classic” cardiovascular risk factors, whether hypertension, diabetes, obesity, hypercholesterolemia or poor diet. In other words, what increases the risk of periodontitis also increases the risk of cardiovascular disease and vice versa, which makes it very difficult to establish a causal link between the two diseases.

Table 3. Similarity between risk factors for cardiovascular disease and periodontitis.

Cardiovascular risk factorsImpact on the risk of periodontitisSources
SmokingCompared to non-smokers, the risk of periodontitis is 18 times higher in smokers aged 20–49 and 25 times higher in smokers aged 50 and over.Hyman and Reid (2003)
HypertensionPeriodontitis, especially severe forms of the disease, is associated with higher systolic and diastolic pressures and an increased risk of hypertension (≥140 mmHg systolic, ≥90 mmHg diastolic).Aguilera et al. (2020)
DyslipidemiasPeriodontitis is associated with higher levels of LDL cholesterol and triglycerides, as well as lower levels of HDL cholesterol.Nepomuceno et al. (2017)
Diabetes (types 1 and 2)See Table 1
ObesityObesity, especially at the abdominal level, is associated with a higher prevalence of periodontitis in young adults. Al-Zahrani et al. (2003)
Diet quality
Fruit and vegetable deficiencyA diet rich in fruits and vegetables is associated with a decreased risk of periodontitis.Dodington et al. (2015)
Fibre and whole-grain deficiencyHigh fibre intake is associated with lower prevalence and severity of periodontitis. Nielsen et al. (2016)
The protective effect of fibre contributes to the decrease in the risk of periodontitis associated with a high intake of whole grains.Merchant et al. (2006)
High intake of simple carbohydrates Consumption of added sugars is associated with an increase of about 50% in the prevalence of periodontitis (and caries).Lula et al. (2014)
High intake of saturated fatsA greater portion of energy intake in the form of saturated fats is associated with an increased risk of periodontitis, possibly due to the pro-inflammatory action of these fatty acids.Iwasaki et al. (2011)

That being said, some studies have tried to establish this link by adjusting the risk of periodontitis to take into account the impact of these confounding factors. For example, the Swedish PAROKRANK study reported a significant increase (28%) in the risk of a first heart attack in people affected by periodontitis, even after subtracting the contribution of the main cardiovascular risk factors. According to the currently available clinical data, it is estimated that periodontitis could be an independent risk factor for cardiovascular disease, with an increase of about 10–15% in risk.

Beneficial treatment
A causal link between periodontitis and cardiovascular disease is also suggested by certain studies showing that periodontal treatments (scaling and root planing) are associated with an improvement in certain cardiovascular health parameters and/or a decrease in cardiovascular events. For example, in patients with periodontitis, removal of subgingival plaque by root planing (under local anesthesia) resulted in improved endothelial function (dilation of vessels by blood flow) within 6 months of treatment. Several other studies have confirmed this positive impact of periodontal treatment on vessel function as well as on other important parameters of cardiovascular health, such as levels of inflammatory molecules and cholesterol levels (total, LDL and HDL). This improvement is particularly noticeable in patients with comorbidities such as metabolic syndrome, diabetes or cardiovascular disease, suggesting that periodontal treatment may be useful for patients at high risk of cardiovascular events. In this sense, it is interesting to note that a recent study reported that periodontal treatment of patients with a recent stroke was associated with a decrease in the overall risk of cardiovascular events in the following year, as measured by a combination of the incidence of stroke, infarction and sudden death.

Overall, these studies raise the possibility that the development of cardiovascular disease may indeed be directly influenced by the presence of periodontal lesions. This close link illustrates how an imbalance affecting one part of the body, in this case the tissues surrounding the teeth, can negatively influence the entire human body. Good health is a global state: even if our organs each have a well-defined role, their proper functioning remains strongly influenced by the general conditions prevailing throughout the body. This is particularly true with regard to inflammation, a condition that favours the development of all chronic diseases and which is responsible for the majority of deaths affecting the population. In this context, the increased risk of several diseases associated with periodontitis, especially cardiovascular disease, is not so surprising, since it essentially represents another example of the damage that can be caused by the presence of these chronic inflammatory conditions.

The close association between oral and cardiovascular health therefore suggests that the prevention and treatment of periodontitis may play important roles in the prevention of cardiovascular disease, particularly in those at higher risk due to being overweight, diabetes or a history of cardiovascular disease. This important link between the teeth and the rest of the body unfortunately remains under-exploited because medicine and dentistry are distinct disciplines, which have evolved in parallel, without much interaction between them. While one can be treated for free for all diseases that affect the body (in Canada), dental care does not benefit from this coverage and is therefore out of reach for those less well off. There is no doubt that this situation contributes to the high prevalence of periodontitis in our society and to the negative repercussions associated with these infections on health in general. Extending health insurance to cover dental care would therefore be an important step forward for cardiovascular prevention and the prevention of several other chronic diseases.

Childhood obesity, a ticking time bomb for cardiometabolic diseases

Childhood obesity, a ticking time bomb for cardiometabolic diseases

OVERVIEW

  • Obesity rates among Canadian children and teens have more than tripled over the past 40 years.
  • Childhood obesity is associated with a marked increase in the risk of type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease in adulthood, which can significantly reduce healthy life expectancy.
  • Policies to improve the diet of young people are key to reversing this trend and preventing an epidemic ofcardiometabolic diseases affecting young adults in the coming years.

One of the most dramatic changes to have occurred in recent years is undoubtedly the marked increase in the number of overweight children. For example, obesity rates among Canadian children and adolescents have more than tripled over the past 40 years. Whereas in 1975, obesity was a fairly rare problem affecting less than 3% of children aged 5–19, the prevalence of obesity has made a gigantic leap since that time, affecting nearly 14% of boys and 10% of girls in 2016 (Figure 1). If data on overweight is added to these figures, then approximately 25% of young Canadians are overweight (a similar trend is observed in Quebec). This prevalence of obesity appears to have plateaued in recent years, but recent US surveys suggest that the COVID-19 pandemic may have caused an upsurge in the number of overweight young people, particularly among 5-11-year-olds.

Figure 1. Increase in the prevalence of obesity among Canadian children over the past 40 years. From NCD Risk Factor Collaboration (2017).

Measuring childhood obesity
Although not perfect, the most common measure used to determine the presence of overweight in young people under the age of 19 is the body mass index (BMI), calculated by dividing the weight by the square of height (kg/m²). However, the values obtained must be adjusted according to age and sex to take into account changes in body composition during growth, as shown in Figure 2.

Figure 2. WHO growth standards for boys aged 5–19 living in Canada. Data comes from WHO (2007).

Note that a wide range of BMI on either side of the median (50th percentile) is considered normal. Overweight children have a BMI higher than that of 85–95% of the population of the same age (85th-95th percentile), while the BMI of obese children is higher than that of 97% of the population of the same age (97th percentile and above). Using z-scores is another way to visualize childhood overweight and obesity. This measurement expresses the deviation of the BMI from the mean value, in standard deviation. For example, a z-score of 1 means that the BMI is one standard deviation above normal (corresponding to overweight), while z-scores of 2 and 3 indicate, respectively, the presence of obesity and severe obesity.

This marked increase in the proportion of overweight children, and particularly obese children, is a worrying trend that bodes very badly for the health of future generations of adults. On the one hand, it is well established that obesity during childhood (and especially during adolescence) represents a very high risk factor for obesity in adulthood, with more than 80% of obese adults who were already obese during their childhood. This obesity in adulthood is associated with an increased risk of a host of health problems, both from a cardiovascular point of view (hypertension, dyslipidemia, ischemic diseases) and the development of metabolic abnormalities (hyperglycemia, resistance to insulin, type 2 diabetes) and certain types of cancer. Obesity can also cause discrimination and social stigma and therefore have devastating consequences on the quality of life, both physically and mentally.

Another very damaging aspect of childhood obesity, which is rarely mentioned, is the dramatic acceleration of the development of all the diseases associated with overweight. In other words, obese children are not only at higher risk of suffering from the various pathologies caused by obesity in adulthood, but these diseases can also affect them at an early age, sometimes even before reaching adulthood, and thus considerably reduce their healthy life expectancy. These early impacts of childhood obesity on the development of diseases associated with overweight are well illustrated by the results of several recent studies on type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease.

Early diabetes
Traditionally, type 2 diabetes was an extremely rare disease among young people (it was even called “adult diabetes” at one time), but its incidence has increased dramatically with the rise in the proportion of obese young people. For example, recent US statistics show that the prevalence of type 2 diabetes in children aged 10–19 has increased from 0.34 per 1000 children in 2001 to 0.67 in 2017, an increase of almost 100% since the beginning of the millennium.

The main risk factors for early diabetes are obesity, especially severe obesity (BMI greater than 35) or when the excess fat is mainly located in the abdomen, a family history of the disease, and belonging to certain ethnic groups. However, obesity remains the main risk factor for type 2 diabetes: in obese children (4–10 years) and adolescents (11–18 years), glucose intolerance is frequently observed during induced hyperglycemia tests, a phenomenon caused by the early development of insulin resistance. A characteristic of type 2 diabetes in young people is its rapid development. Whereas in adults, the transition from a prediabetic state to clearly defined diabetes is generally a gradual process, occurring over a period of 5–10 years, this transition can occur very quickly in young people, in less than 2 years. This means that the disease is much more aggressive in young people than in older people and can cause the early onset of various complications, particularly at the cardiovascular level.

A recent study, published in the prestigious New England Journal of Medicine, clearly illustrates the dangers that arise from early-onset type 2 diabetes, appearing during childhood or adolescence. In this study, the researchers recruited extremely obese children (BMI ≥ 35) who had been diagnosed with type 2 diabetes in adolescence and subsequently examined for ten years the evolution of different risk factors and pathologies associated with this disease.

The results are very worrying, because the vast majority of patients in the study developed one or more complications during follow-up that significantly increased their risk of developing serious health problems (Figure 3). Of particular note is the high incidence of hypertension, dyslipidemia (LDL-cholesterol and triglyceride levels too high), and kidney (nephropathies) and nerve damage (neuropathies) in this population, which, it should be remembered, is only 26 years on average. Worse still, almost a third of these young adults had 2 or more complications, which obviously increases the risk of deterioration of their health even more. Moreover, it should be noted that 17 serious cardiovascular accidents (infarction, heart failure, stroke) occurred during the follow-up period, which is abnormally high given the young age of the patients and the relatively small number of people who participated in the study (500 patients).

Figure 3. Incidence of different complications associated with type 2 diabetes in adolescents. From TODAY Study Group (2021).

It should also be noted that these complications occurred despite the fact that the majority of these patients were treated with antidiabetic drugs such as metformin or insulin. This is consistent with several studies showing that type 2 diabetes is much harder to control in young people than in middle-aged people. The mechanisms responsible for this difference are still poorly understood, but it seems that the development of insulin resistance and the deterioration of the pancreatic cells that produce this hormone progress much faster in young people than in older people, which complicates blood sugar control and increases the risk of complications.

This difficulty in effectively treating early type 2 diabetes means that young diabetics are much more at risk of dying prematurely than non-diabetics (Figure 4). For example, young people who develop early diabetes, before the age of 30, have a mortality rate 3 times higher than the population of the same age who is not diabetic. This increase remains significant, although less pronounced, until about age 50, while cases of diabetes that appear at older ages (60 years and over) do not have a major impact on mortality compared to the general population. It should be noted that this increase in mortality affecting the youngest diabetics is particularly pronounced at a young age, around 40 years of age.

These results therefore show how early type 2 diabetes can lead to a rapid deterioration in health and take decades off life, including years that are often considered the most productive of life (forties and fifties). For all these reasons, type 2 diabetes must be considered one of the main collateral damages of childhood obesity.

Figure 4. Age-standardized mortality rates for diagnosis of type 2 diabetes. Standardized mortality rates represent the ratio of mortality observed in individuals with diabetes to anticipated mortality for each age group. From Al-Saeed et al. (2016).

Cardiovascular disease
In recent years, there has been an upsurge in the incidence of cardiovascular disease in young adults. This new trend is surprising given that mortality from cardiovascular diseases has been in constant decline for several years in the general population (thanks in particular to a reduction in the number of smokers and improved treatments), and one might have expected that young people would also benefit from these positive developments.

The data collected so far strongly suggests that the increase in the prevalence of obesity among young people contributes to this upsurge of premature cardiovascular diseases, before the age of 55. On the one hand, it has been shown that a genetic predisposition to develop overweight during childhood is associated with an increased risk of coronary heart disease (and type 2 diabetes) in adulthood. On the other hand, this increased risk has also been observed in long-term studies examining the association between the weight of individuals during childhood and the incidence of cardiovascular events once they have reached adulthood. For example, a large Danish study of over 275,000 school-aged children (7–13 years old) showed that each one-unit increase in BMI z-score at these ages (see legend to Figure 2 for the definition of the z-score) was associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular disease in adulthood, after 25 years (Figure 5).

This increased risk is directly proportional to the age at which children are overweight, i.e., the more a high BMI is present at older ages, the greater the risk of suffering a cardiovascular event later in adulthood. For example, an increase of 1 in the z -score of 13-year-old children is associated with twice as much of an increase in risk in adulthood as a similar increase in a 7-year-old child (Figure 5). Similar results are observed for girls, but the increased risk of cardiovascular disease is lower than for boys.


Figure 5. Relationship between body mass index in childhood and the risk of cardiovascular disease in adulthood. The values represent the risks associated with a 1-unit increase in BMI z-score at each age. From Baker et al. (2007).

Early atherosclerosis
Several studies suggest that the increased risk of cardiovascular disease in adulthood observed in overweight children is a consequence of the early development of several risk factors that accelerate the process of atherosclerosis. Autopsy studies of obese adolescents who died of non-cardiovascular causes (e.g., accidents) revealed that fibrous atherosclerotic plaques were already present in the aorta and coronary arteries, indicating an abnormally rapid progression of atherosclerosis.

As mentioned earlier, type 2 diabetes is certainly the worst risk factor that can generate this premature progression, because the vast majority of diabetic children and adolescents very quickly develop several abnormalities that considerably increase the risk of serious damage to blood vessels (Figure 3). But even without the presence of early diabetes, studies show that several risk factors for cardiovascular disease are already present in overweight children, such as hypertension, dyslipidemia, chronic inflammation, glucose intolerance or even vascular abnormalities (thickening of the internal wall of the carotid artery, for example). Exposure to these factors that begins in childhood therefore creates favourable conditions for the premature development of atherosclerosis, thereby increasing the risk of cardiovascular events in adulthood.

It should be noted, however, that the negative impact of childhood obesity on health in adulthood is not irreversible. Indeed, studies show that people who were overweight or obese during childhood, but who had a normal weight in adulthood, have a risk of cardiovascular disease similar to that of people who have been thin all their lives. However, obesity is extremely difficult to treat, both in childhood and in adulthood, and the best way to avoid prolonged chronic exposure to excess fat and damage to cardiovascular health (and health in general) which results from it is obviously to prevent the problem at the source by modifying lifestyle factors, which are closely associated with an increased risk of developing overweight, in particular the nature of the diet and physical activity (psychosocial stress may also play a role). Given the catastrophic effects of childhood obesity on health, cardiovascular health in particular, the potential for this early preventive approach (called “primordial prevention”) is immense and could help halt the current rise in diabetes and premature mortality affecting young adults.

Ideal cardiovascular health
A recent study shows how this primordial prevention approach can have an extraordinary impact on cardiovascular health. In this study, researchers determined the ideal cardiovascular health score, as defined by the American Heart Association (Table 1), of more than 3 million South Koreans with an average age of 20–39 years. Excess weight is a very important element of this score because of its influence on other risk factors also used in the score such as hypertension, fasting hyperglycemia and cholesterol.

Participants were followed for a period of approximately 16 years, and the incidence of premature cardiovascular disease (before age 55) was assessed using as the primary endpoint a combination of hospitalization for infarction, stroke, cardiac insufficiency, or sudden cardiac death.

Table 1. Parameters used to define the ideal cardiovascular health score. Since there is 1 point for each target reached, a score of 6 reflects optimal cardiovascular health. Adapted from Lloyd-Jones et al. (2010), excluding dietary factors that were not assessed in the Korean study.

As shown in Figure 6, cardiovascular health in early adulthood has a decisive influence on the risk of cardiovascular events that occur prematurely, before the age of 55. Compared to participants in very poor cardiovascular health at the start (score of 0), each additional target reached reduces the risk of cardiovascular events, with maximum protection of approximately 85% in people whose lifestyle allows achieving 5 or more ideal heart health targets (scores of 5 and 6). Similar results were obtained in the United States and show how early health, from childhood through young adulthood, plays a key role in preventing the development of cardiovascular disease during aging.

Figure 6. Influence of cardiovascular health in young adults on the risk of premature cardiovascular events. From Lee et al. (2021).

Yet our society remains strangely passive in the face of the rise in childhood obesity, as if the increase in body weight of children and adolescents has become the norm and that nothing can be done to reverse this trend. This lack of interest is really difficult to understand, because the current situation is a ticking time bomb that risks causing a tsunami of premature chronic diseases in the near future, affecting young adults. This is an extremely worrying scenario if we consider that our healthcare system, in addition to having to contend with diseases that affect an aging population (1 out of 4 Quebecers will be over 65 in 2030), will also have to deal with younger patients suffering from cardiometabolic diseases caused by overweight. Needless to say, this will be a significant burden on healthcare systems.

This situation is not inevitable, however, as governments have concrete legislative means that can be used to try to reverse this trend. Several policies aimed at improving diet quality to prevent disease can be quickly implemented:

  • Taxing sugary drinks. A simple and straightforward approach that has been adopted by several countries is to introduce a tax on industrial food products, especially soft drinks. The principle is the same as for all taxes affecting other products harmful to health such as alcohol and tobacco, i.e., an increase in prices is generally associated with a reduction in consumption. Studies that have examined the impact of this approach for soft drinks indicate that this is indeed the case, with reductions in consumption observed (among others) in Mexico, Berkeley (California) and Barbados. This approach therefore represents a promising tool, especially if the amounts collected are reinvested in order to improve the diet of the population (subsidies for the purchase of fruit and vegetables, for example).
  • Requiring clear nutrition labels on packaging. We can help consumers make informed choices by clearly indicating on the front of the product whether it is high in sugar, fat or salt, as is the case in Chile (see our article on this subject).
  • Eliminating the marketing of unhealthy foods for children. The example of Chile also shows that severe restrictions can be imposed on the marketing of junk food products by prohibiting the advertising of these products in programs or websites aimed at young people as well as by prohibiting their sale in schools. The United Kingdom plans to take such an approach very soon by eliminating all advertising online and on television of products high in sugar, salt and fat before 9 p.m., while Mexico has gone even further by banning all sales of junk food products to children.

There is no reason Canada should not adopt such approaches to protect the health of young people.

Lignans: Compounds of plant origin that promote good cardiovascular health

Lignans: Compounds of plant origin that promote good cardiovascular health

OVERVIEW

  • Dietary lignans are phenolic compounds that come mainly from plant-based foods, especially seeds, whole grains, fruits, vegetables, wine, tea and coffee.
  • Consumption of lignans is associated with a reduced risk of developing cardiovascular disease, according to several well-conducted studies.

There are over 8,000 phenolic and polyphenolic compounds found in plants. These compounds are not nutrients, but they have various beneficial biological activities in the human body. They are generally grouped into 4 classes: phenolic acids, flavonoids, stilbenes (e.g., resveratrol), and lignans. Lignans are dimers of monolignols, which can also be used in the synthesis of a long branched polymer, lignin, found in the walls of the conductive vessels of plants. From a nutritional standpoint, lignins are considered to be a component of insoluble dietary fibre.

Figure 1. Structures of the main dietary lignans

Dietary lignans, the most important of which are matairesinol, secoisolariciresinol, pinoresinol and lariciresinol, come mainly from plant-based foods, particularly seeds, whole grains, fruits, vegetables, wine, tea and coffee (see Table 1). Other lignans are found only in certain types of food, such as medioresinol (sesame seeds, rye, lemon), syringaresinol (grains), sesamin (sesame seeds). Lignans are converted into enterolignans by the gut microbiota, which are then absorbed into the bloodstream and distributed throughout the body.

Table 1. Lignan content of commonly consumed foods.
Adapted from Peterson et al., 2010 and Rodriguez-Garcia et al., 2019.

Several studies indicate that lignans can prevent cardiovascular disease and other chronic diseases, including cancer, and improve cardiovascular health, through its anti-inflammatory and estrogenic properties (the ability to bind to estrogen receptors).

A recently published US study indicates that there is a significant association between dietary intake of lignans and the incidence of coronary heart disease. Among the 214,108 people from 3 cohorts of healthcare professionals, those who consumed the most lignans (total) had a 15% lower risk of developing coronary heart disease than those who consumed little. Considering each lignan separately, the association was particularly favourable for matairesinol (-24%), compared to secoisolariciresinol (-13%), pinoresinol (-11%), and lariciresinol (-11%). There is a nonlinear dose-response relationship for total lignans, matairesinol, and secoisolariciresinol with a plateau (maximum effect) at approximately 300 µg/day, 10 µg/day, and 100 µg/day, respectively. Canadians consume an average of 857 µg of lignans per day, enough to benefit from the positive effects on cardiovascular health, but residents of some Western countries such as the United Kingdom, the United States and Germany do not have an optimal intake of lignans (Table 2).

The favourable association for lignans was especially apparent among participants who had a high dietary fibre intake. The authors of the study suggest that fibre, by supporting a healthy microbiota, may promote the production of enterolignans in the gut.

Table 2. Daily intake of lignans in Western countries.
Adapted from Peterson et al., 2010.

PREDIMED (Prevención con Dieta Mediterránea), a recognized study conducted among over 7,000 Spaniards (55–80 years old) at high risk of developing cardiovascular disease, compared the Mediterranean diet (supplemented with nuts and extra virgin olive) to a low-fat diet advocated by the American Heart Association for the prevention of cardiovascular disease (CVD). In this study, the Mediterranean diet was clearly superior to the low-fat diet in preventing CVD, so the study was stopped after 4.8 years for ethical reasons. Further analysis of the PREDIMED data showed that there is a very favourable association between a high dietary intake of polyphenols and the risk of CVD. Participants who consumed the most total polyphenols had a 46% lower risk of CVD than those who consumed the least. The polyphenols that were most strongly associated with reduced risk of CVD were flavanols (-60%), hydroxybenzoic acids (-53%), and lignans (-49%). It should be noted that the nuts and extra virgin olive oil that were consumed daily by participants in the PREDIMED study contain appreciable amounts of lignans.

Another analysis  of data from the PREDIMED study showed a favourable association between total polyphenol intake and the risk of death from any cause. A high intake of total polyphenols, compared to a low intake, was associated with a 37% reduction in the risk of premature mortality. Stilbenes and lignans were the most favourable polyphenols for reducing the risk of mortality, by 52% and 40%, respectively. In this case, flavonoids and phenolic acids were not associated with a significant reduction in mortality risk.

No randomized controlled studies on phenolic compounds and the risk of CVD have been performed to date. There is therefore no direct evidence that lignans protect the cardiovascular system, but all the data from population studies suggests that it is beneficial for health to increase the dietary intake of lignans and therefore to eat more fruits, vegetables, whole grains, legumes, nuts and extra virgin olive oil, which are excellent sources of these still too little known plant-based compounds.